[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdao8LF8g5qi_h+9BT9cHwmB4OadabkdGfP0sEFeLbmiLw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:36:01 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, soc@...nel.org,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Teichmann <lists@...er-teichmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com> wrote:
> As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x
> devices. While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years,
> these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example).
I suppose it could be a good idea to add support for iop32x to
OpenWrt and/or OpenEmbedded, both of which support some
pretty constrained systems. I am personally using these
distributions to support elder ARM hardware these days.
Just my €0.01
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists