linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 10:36:01 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com>
Cc:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, soc@...nel.org,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Teichmann <lists@...er-teichmann.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] [RFC] ARM: remove Intel iop33x and iop13xx support

On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 11:45 AM Martin Michlmayr <tbm@...ius.com> wrote:

> As Arnd points out, Debian used to have support for various iop32x
> devices.  While Debian hasn't supported iop32x in a number of years,
> these devices are still usable and in use (RMK being a prime example).

I suppose it could be a good idea to add support for iop32x to
OpenWrt and/or OpenEmbedded, both of which support some
pretty constrained systems. I am personally using these
distributions to support elder ARM hardware these days.

Just my €0.01
Linus Walleij