[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814121154.12f488f7@localhost>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:11:54 +0300
From: Kernel User <linux-kernel@...eup.net>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/ doesn't show all known
CPU vulnerabilities
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 09:04:57 +0200 Borislav Petkov wrote:
> IMO, what you want does not belong in sysfs but in documentation.
How would documentation (a fixed static text file) tell whether a
particular system is vulnerable or not?
> I partially see your point that a table of sorts mapping all those CPU
> vulnerability names to (possible) mitigations is needed for users
> which would like to know whether they're covered, without having to
> run some scripts from github,
Correct.
> but sysfs just ain't the place.
Then why is it currently used for some of the vulnerabilities?
I am not an expert and I don't know if it is the place. My only concern
is to have that information which we currently don't regardless of
where it may be placed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists