[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74d12529-d068-0210-e229-5cea68bcf9da@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 19:40:58 +1000
From: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>
To: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@...six.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@...ux.ibm.com>,
Reza Arbab <arbab@...ux.ibm.com>,
Chandan Rajendra <chandan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
christophe leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/7] powerpc: add machine check safe copy_to_user
On 12/8/19 7:22 pm, Santosh Sivaraj wrote:
> Use memcpy_mcsafe() implementation to define copy_to_user_mcsafe()
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <santosh@...six.org>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index 77f6ebf97113..4316e36095a2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ config PPC
> select ARCH_HAS_STRICT_KERNEL_RWX if ((PPC_BOOK3S_64 || PPC32) && !RELOCATABLE && !HIBERNATION)
> select ARCH_HAS_TICK_BROADCAST if GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS_BROADCAST
> select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_FLUSHCACHE if PPC64
> + select ARCH_HAS_UACCESS_MCSAFE if PPC64
> select ARCH_HAS_UBSAN_SANITIZE_ALL
> select ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG
> select ARCH_KEEP_MEMBLOCK
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index 8b03eb44e876..15002b51ff18 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -387,6 +387,20 @@ static inline unsigned long raw_copy_to_user(void __user *to,
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static __always_inline unsigned long __must_check
> +copy_to_user_mcsafe(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
> +{
> + if (likely(check_copy_size(from, n, true))) {
> + if (access_ok(to, n)) {
> + allow_write_to_user(to, n);
> + n = memcpy_mcsafe((void *)to, from, n);
> + prevent_write_to_user(to, n);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return n;
Do we always return n independent of the check_copy_size return value and access_ok return values?
Balbir Singh.
> +}
> +
> extern unsigned long __clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size);
>
> static inline unsigned long clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long size)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists