[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190814104131.20190-5-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:41:26 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de, kan.liang@...el.com,
mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
riel@...riel.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] arm/perf: correctly check for kthreads
The arm perf_callchain_user() functions looks at current->mm,
apparently to determine whether the thread is a kthread without any
valid user context.
In general, a non-NULL current->mm doesn't imply that current is a
kthread, as kthreads can install an mm via use_mm(), and so it's
preferable to use is_kthread() to determine whether a thread is a
kthread.
For consistency, let's use is_kthread() here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
index 3b69a76d341e..5c920f2c46a8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_callchain.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ perf_callchain_user(struct perf_callchain_entry_ctx *entry, struct pt_regs *regs
perf_callchain_store(entry, regs->ARM_pc);
- if (!current->mm)
+ if (is_kthread(current))
return;
tail = (struct frame_tail __user *)regs->ARM_fp - 1;
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists