[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190814104131.20190-8-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 11:41:29 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ak@...ux.intel.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de, kan.liang@...el.com,
mark.rutland@....com, mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
riel@...riel.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] x86/lbr: correctly check for kthreads
The x86 lbr branch_type() functions looks at current->mm, apparently to
determine whether the thread is a kthread without any valid user
context.
In general, a non-NULL current->mm doesn't imply that current is a
kthread, as kthreads can install an mm via use_mm(), and so it's
preferable to use is_kthread() to determine whether a thread is a
kthread.
For consistency, let's use is_kthread() here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 6f814a27416b..ed2b7e57a249 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -857,7 +857,7 @@ static int branch_type(unsigned long from, unsigned long to, int abort)
* can happen if measuring at the user level only
* and we interrupt in a kernel thread, e.g., idle.
*/
- if (!current->mm)
+ if (is_kthread(current))
return X86_BR_NONE;
/* may fail if text not present */
--
2.11.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists