linux-kernel - Re: kexec on rk3399

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c6993a1e-6fc2-44ab-b59e-152142e2ff4d@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:53:55 +0200
From:   Vicente Bergas <vicencb@...il.com>
To:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Matthias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kexec on rk3399

On Monday, July 22, 2019 4:31:27 PM CEST, Vicente Bergas wrote:
> Hi, i have been running linux on rk3399 booted with kexec fine until 5.2
> From 5.2 onwards, there are memory corruption issues as reported here:
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1906.2/07211.html
> kexec has been identified as the principal reason for the issues.
>
> It turns out that kexec has never worked reliably on this platform,
> i was just lucky until recently.
>
> Please, can you provide some directions on how to debug the issue?

Thank you all for your suggestions on where the issue could be.

It seems that it was the USB driver.
Now using v5.2.8 booted with kexec from v5.2.8 with a workaround and
so far so good. It is being tested on the Sapphire board.

The workaround is:
--- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/dwc3-of-simple.c
@@ -133,6 +133,13 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dwc3_of_simple_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct dwc3_of_simple *simple = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	reset_control_assert(simple->resets);
+}
+
 static int __maybe_unused dwc3_of_simple_runtime_suspend(struct device 
*dev)
 {
 	struct dwc3_of_simple	*simple = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
@@ -190,6 +197,7 @@
 static struct platform_driver dwc3_of_simple_driver = {
 	.probe		= dwc3_of_simple_probe,
 	.remove		= dwc3_of_simple_remove,
+	.shutdown	= dwc3_of_simple_shutdown,
 	.driver		= {
 		.name	= "dwc3-of-simple",
 		.of_match_table = of_dwc3_simple_match,

If this patch is OK after review i can resubmit it as a pull request.
Should a similar change be applied to drivers/usb/dwc3/core.c ?

Regards,
  Vicenç.