[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190814130708.b4lu3d6enkga5p4h@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:07:08 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bp@...e.de, catalin.marinas@....com,
davem@...emloft.net, hch@....de, kan.liang@...el.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, riel@...riel.com,
will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: correctly check for kthreads
On 2019-08-14 11:41:30 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote:
> Per commit:
>
> 0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
>
> ... switch_fpu_state() is trying to distinguish user threads from
> kthreads, such that kthreads consistently use init_pkru_value. It does
> do by looking at current->mm.
>
> In general, a non-NULL current->mm doesn't imply that current is a
> kthread, as kthreads can install an mm via use_mm(), and so it's
> preferable to use is_kthread() to determine whether a thread is a
> kthread.
I think this was missed in commit.
8d3289f2fa1e0 ("x86/fpu: Don't use current->mm to check for a kthread")
A kthread with use_mm() would load here non-existing FPU state.
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists