[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae26aa4d-eb98-cdd5-1338-11a46d440584@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:25:14 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] x86: KVM: svm: get rid of hardcoded instructions
lengths
On 13/08/19 15:53, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Changes since v3 [Sean Christopherson]:
> - add Reviewed-by tag to PATCH5
> - __skip_emulated_instruction()/skip_emulated_instruction() split,
> 'unlikely(r != EMULATE_DONE)' in PATCH2
> - Make nested_svm_vmrun() return an int in PATCH6 (moved from PATCH7)
> - Avoid weird-looking 'if (rc) return ret' in PATCH7
>
> Original description:
>
> Jim rightfully complains that hardcoding instuctions lengths is not always
> correct: additional (redundant) prefixes can be used. Luckily, the ugliness
> is mostly harmless: modern AMD CPUs support NRIP_SAVE feature but I'd like
> to clean things up and sacrifice speed in favor of correctness.
Queued, thanks.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists