lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:42:46 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] usb: typec: fusb302: Small changes

Hi,

On 14-08-19 15:24, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This series removes the deprecated fusb302 specific properties, and
> stops using struct tcpc_config in the driver.

Series looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

This has a small conflict with my
"[PATCH] usb: typec: fusb302: Call fusb302_debugfs_init earlier"
patch.

Since we've agreed to do the rootdir leak fix as a separate patch
(which I will write when I find some time probably tomorrow), I
was wondering if we can merge my patch first. I would like to see
a "Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org" added to my patch and then it would
be good to have it merged first.

Regardless we should probable prepare one series with all patches
for Greg to make this easy to merge for him.

Shall I combine this series + my fix + my to be written fix into
1 series, test that on actual hardware and then post that?

Regards,

Hans

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ