linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/91] 4.19.67-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190815193716.GG30437@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 21:37:16 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/91] 4.19.67-stable review

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 08:58:55AM -0500, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 8/14/19 10:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.67 release.
> > > There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Fri 16 Aug 2019 04:55:34 PM UTC.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> >
> > Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
> > --------------
> > Error log:
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
> > Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
> >    PERF_VERSION = 4.9.189.ge000f87
> > util/machine.c: In function ‘machine__create_module’:
> > util/machine.c:1088:43: error: ‘size’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘die’?
> >    if (arch__fix_module_text_start(&start, &size, name) < 0)
> >                                             ^~~~
> >                                             die
> > util/machine.c:1088:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> We noticed this exact failure but not on 4.19. For us, 4.19's perf builds fine.
> 
> On 4.9, perf failed with the error you described, as it looks like
> it's missing 9ad4652b66f1 ("perf record: Fix wrong size in
> perf_record_mmap for last kernel module"), though I have not verified
> yet.

I've queued that up now, and will push out the 4.9-rc tree, so let's see
if that fixes it or not.

thanks,

greg k-h