linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/admin-guide: Embargoed hardware security issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190815210420.GA12041@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 23:04:20 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        security@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/admin-guide: Embargoed hardware security
 issues

On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 05:12:44PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 02:17:00AM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > 
> > > To address the requirements of embargoed hardware issues, like Meltdown,
> > > Spectre, L1TF, etc. it is necessary to define and document a process for
> > > handling embargoed hardware security issues.
> > 
> > I don't know what exactly went wrong, but there is a much more up-to-date 
> > version of that document (especially when it comes to vendor contacts), 
> > which I sent around on Thu, 2 May 2019 20:23:48 +0200 (CEST) already. 
> > Please find it below.
> 
> Ah, sorry, don't know what happened here, we had too many different
> versions floating around.
> 
> I'll take your version, make the edits recommended and send out a new
> one in a few days, thanks!

Looks like your version only had the difference being the list of
ambassadors and a bunch of people who reviewed the document.  No
text changes in the document itself, which was good to see we all agreed
on the correct wording  :)

thanks,

greg k-h