[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201908151530.D4B1EF76AA@keescook>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:31:27 -0700
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: hpa@...or.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Shawn Landden <shawn@....icu>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] compiler_attributes.h: Add 'fallthrough' pseudo
keyword for switch/case use
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:15:53AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> I want to recant my position on Coverity coverage being a requirement
> here. While I was originally concerned about suddenly adding thousands
> more warnings to Coverity scans (if it doesn't support the flag --
> I should know soon), it's been made clear to me we're now at the point
For the record, Coverity *does*[1] support the attribute flag.
-Kees
[1] This should be visible with a Coverity account:
https://scan3.coverity.com/reports.htm#v39370/p12360/fileInstanceId=27181923&defectInstanceId=7915635&mergedDefectId=220491
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists