[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190815102649.GA10821@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 03:26:49 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Foster <bfoster@...hat.com>,
Allison Collins <allison.henderson@...cle.com>,
Nick Bowler <nbowler@...conx.ca>,
Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/18] xfs: compat_ioctl: use compat_ptr()
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 01:02:11AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> In many ways I'd actually much rather have a table driven approach.
> Let me try something..
Ok, it seems like we don't even need a table containing native and
compat as we can just fall back. The tables still seem nicer to read,
though.
Let me know what you think of this:
http://git.infradead.org/users/hch/xfs.git/shortlog/refs/heads/xfs-ioctl-table
I also wonder if we should life the ioctl handler tables to the
VFS..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists