[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190815125103.GH43882@e119886-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 13:51:03 +0100
From: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Cc: jingoohan1@...il.com, gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
shawnguo@...nel.org, leoyang.li@....com, kishon@...com,
lorenzo.pieralisi@....com, arnd@...db.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, minghuan.Lian@....com,
mingkai.hu@....com, roy.zang@....com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
capability with different PEX
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> capability, make it more flexible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> struct ls_pcie_ep {
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> };
>
> #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> { },
> };
>
> -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> - .linkup_notifier = false,
> - .msi_capable = true,
> - .msix_capable = false,
> -};
> -
> static const struct pci_epc_features*
> ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> {
> - return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> +
> + return pcie->ls_epc;
> }
>
> static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> enum pci_barno bar;
>
> for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> +
> + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> }
>
> static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
> @@ -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct dw_pcie *pci;
> struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> struct resource *dbi_base;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (!pci)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!ls_epc)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
> pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> pcie->pci = pci;
>
> + ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> + ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> + ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there any
reason to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
Thanks,
Andrew Murray
> + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> +
> + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> +
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
>
> ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> --
> 2.9.5
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists