[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190815132318.GA27208@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 15:23:18 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
Gavin Li <git@...gavinli.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Olav Kongas <ok@...ecdesign.ee>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
Bin Liu <b-liu@...com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: next take at setting up a dma mask by default for platform
devices
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is another attempt to make sure the dma_mask pointer is always
> initialized for platform devices. Not doing so lead to lots of
> boilerplate code, and makes platform devices different from all our
> major busses like PCI where we always set up a dma_mask. In the long
> run this should also help to eventually make dma_mask a scalar value
> instead of a pointer and remove even more cruft.
>
> The bigger blocker for this last time was the fact that the usb
> subsystem uses the presence or lack of a dma_mask to check if the core
> should do dma mapping for the driver, which is highly unusual. So we
> fix this first. Note that this has some overlap with the pending
> desire to use the proper dma_mmap_coherent helper for mapping usb
> buffers. The first two patches from this series should probably
> go into 5.3 and then uses as the basis for the decision to use
> dma_mmap_coherent.
I've taken the first 2 patches for 5.3-final. Given that patch 3 needs
to be fixed, I'll wait for a respin of these before considering them.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists