linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/91] 4.19.67-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <654b05a5-ebd6-cf4d-74d3-723e0bd3e40e@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 07:05:26 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/91] 4.19.67-stable review

On 8/15/19 6:58 AM, Daniel Díaz wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> On Thu, 15 Aug 2019 at 08:29, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
>>
>> On 8/14/19 10:00 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.67 release.
>>> There are 91 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Fri 16 Aug 2019 04:55:34 PM UTC.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>>
>> Building x86_64:tools/perf ... failed
>> --------------
>> Error log:
>> Warning: arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h differs from kernel
>> Warning: arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h differs from kernel
>>     PERF_VERSION = 4.9.189.ge000f87
>> util/machine.c: In function ‘machine__create_module’:
>> util/machine.c:1088:43: error: ‘size’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘die’?
>>     if (arch__fix_module_text_start(&start, &size, name) < 0)
>>                                              ^~~~
>>                                              die
>> util/machine.c:1088:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> 
> We noticed this exact failure but not on 4.19. For us, 4.19's perf builds fine.
> 
> On 4.9, perf failed with the error you described, as it looks like
> it's missing 9ad4652b66f1 ("perf record: Fix wrong size in
> perf_record_mmap for last kernel module"), though I have not verified
> yet.
> 

Uuh, yes, you are correct. I wasn't paying attention (blaming lack of coffee
in the morning). The above error is from v4.9.y.queue, not v4.19.y.queue.

Sorry for the confusion.

Guenter