linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add dual-LVDS panel support to EK874

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190815141559.GB2437@ravnborg.org>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:15:59 +0200
From:   Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To:     Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro@...renesas.com>
Cc:     Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
        Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
        Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>,
        Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        Chris Paterson <Chris.Paterson2@...esas.com>,
        Biju Das <biju.das@...renesas.com>,
        Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
        xu_shunji@...erun.com, ebiharaml@...linux.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] Add dual-LVDS panel support to EK874

Hi Fabrizio

> it appears that Rob has been busy converting the dt-bindings relevant to this
> series, and his changes are now found in linux-next. Most notably
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.txt has now become
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/lvds.yaml
> 
> You have already taken patch:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11072749/
> 
> as such the patch I am sending you is still related to:
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-lvds.txt
> 
> Patch "dt-bindings: display: Add bindings for Advantech IDK-2121WR" is still
> assuming the format is .txt, as I am not too sure about what the protocol is in
> this case? Shall we take this patch and convert it later to .yaml or shall I
> convert it to .yaml straight away?
> 
> Please, let me know what's the best course of action.

It is preferred that all new display and panel bindings uses the new
meta-schema format.
And that the writers uses the available tools to verify the bindings
submission.
This is one way to avoid simple mistakes in examples.

	Sam