[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACO55tvDfxYMZr0BGv2ROSNEVB4GvXZnBnWBy=RDPOG5hnk7OA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 16:25:06 +0200
From: Karol Herbst <kherbst@...hat.com>
To: Mario.Limonciello@...l.com
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
nouveau <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Alex Hung <alex.hung@...onical.com>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Nouveau] [PATCH 1/7] Revert "ACPI / OSI: Add OEM _OSI string to
enable dGPU direct output"
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:20 PM <Mario.Limonciello@...l.com> wrote:
>
> > > There are definitely going to be regressions on machines in the field with the
> > > in tree drivers by reverting this. I think we should have an answer for all of
> > those
> > > before this revert is accepted.
> > >
> > > Regarding systems with Intel+NVIDIA, we'll have to work with partners to
> > collect
> > > some information on the impact of reverting this.
> > >
> > > When this is used on a system with Intel+AMD the ASL configures AMD GPU to
> > use
> > > "Hybrid Graphics" when on Windows and "Power Express" and "Switchable
> > Graphics"
> > > when on Linux.
> >
> > and what's exactly the difference between those? And what's the actual
> > issue here?
>
> DP/HDMI is not detected unless plugged in at bootup. It's due to missing HPD
> events.
>
afaik Lyude was working on fixing all that, at least for some drivers.
If there is something wrong, we still should fix the drivers, not
adding ACPI workarounds.
Alex: do you know if there are remaining issues regarding that with amdgpu?
> >
> > We already have the PRIME offloading in place and if that's not
> > enough, we should work on extending it, not adding some ACPI based
> > workarounds, because that's exactly how that looks like.
> >
> > Also, was this discussed with anybody involved in the drm subsystem?
> >
> > >
> > > I feel we need a knob and/or DMI detection to affect the changes that the ASL
> > > normally performs.
> >
> > Why do we have to do that on a firmware level at all?
>
> Folks from AMD Graphics team recommended this approach. From their perspective
> it's not a workaround. They view this as a different architecture for AMD graphics driver on
> Windows and AMD graphics w/ amdgpu driver. They have different ASL paths used for
> each.
@alex: is this true?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists