linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: lower min ring num

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f61d9621-cc33-44a2-f297-43f8af8d759b@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:01:00 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     ? jiang <jiangkidd@...mail.com>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
        "daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        "jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com" <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
        "hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
        "john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        "kafai@...com" <kafai@...com>,
        "songliubraving@...com" <songliubraving@...com>,
        "yhs@...com" <yhs@...com>,
        "virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org" <xdp-newbies@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jiangran.jr@...baba-inc.com" <jiangran.jr@...baba-inc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-net: lower min ring num_free for efficiency


On 2019/8/14 上午10:06, ? jiang wrote:
> This change lowers ring buffer reclaim threshold from 1/2*queue to budget
> for better performance. According to our test with qemu + dpdk, packet
> dropping happens when the guest is not able to provide free buffer in
> avail ring timely with default 1/2*queue. The value in the patch has been
> tested and does show better performance.


Please add your tests setup and result here.

Thanks


>
> Signed-off-by: jiangkidd <jiangkidd@...mail.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> index 0d4115c9e20b..bc08be7925eb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ static int virtnet_receive(struct receive_queue *rq, int budget,
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> -	if (rq->vq->num_free > virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq) / 2) {
> +	if (rq->vq->num_free > min((unsigned int)budget, virtqueue_get_vring_size(rq->vq)) / 2) {
>   		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, rq, GFP_ATOMIC))
>   			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
>   	}