[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADnq5_MqvH-jUdDUOeBM6zgwYKiv21Wuejw4sR5TwY7bJss_ow@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:28:01 -0400
From: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@...il.com>
To: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
Cc: "Deucher, Alexander" <Alexander.Deucher@....com>,
"Zhou, David(ChunMing)" <David1.Zhou@....com>,
"anthony.wong@...onical.com" <anthony.wong@...onical.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@....com>,
"amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Apply flags after amdgpu_device_ip_init()
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:59 AM Kai-Heng Feng
<kai.heng.feng@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> at 21:33, Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@....com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for finding this! I think the attached patch should fix the issue
> > and it's much less invasive.
>
> Yes it also fix the issue, please add by tested-by:
> Tested-by: Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@...onical.com>
>
Thanks!
> I took this more or less future proof approach because I think this won’t
> be the last chip that needs firmware information, which isn’t available in
> early init, to decides its flags.
>
> Yes it’s intrusive to carve out all flags from early init callbacks, but I
> don’t think it’s that ugly.
Not a bad approach, but I'd prefer to keep the power and clock gating
flags in the asic specifc code rather than in the common code.
Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists