lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190815164650.GA4958@hsiangkao-HP-ZHAN-66-Pro-G1>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 00:46:56 +0800
From:   Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@....com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, Miao Xie <miaoxie@...wei.com>,
        devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 07/24] erofs: add directory operations

Hi Linus,

On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 09:13:19AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 9:42 PM Gao Xiang <gaoxiang25@...wei.com> wrote:
> >
> > +
> > +static const unsigned char erofs_filetype_table[EROFS_FT_MAX] = {
> > +       [EROFS_FT_UNKNOWN]      = DT_UNKNOWN,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_REG_FILE]     = DT_REG,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_DIR]          = DT_DIR,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_CHRDEV]       = DT_CHR,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_BLKDEV]       = DT_BLK,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_FIFO]         = DT_FIFO,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_SOCK]         = DT_SOCK,
> > +       [EROFS_FT_SYMLINK]      = DT_LNK,
> > +};
> 
> Hmm.
> 
> The EROFS_FT_XYZ values seem to match the normal FT_XYZ values, and
> we've lately tried to just have filesystems use the standard ones
> instead of having a (pointless) duplicate conversion between the two.
> 
> And then you can use the common "fs_ftype_to_dtype()" to convert from
> FT_XYZ to DT_XYZ.
> 
> Maybe I'm missing something, and the EROFS_FT_x list actually differs
> from the normal FT_x list some way, but it would be good to not
> introduce another case of this in normal filesystems, just as we've
> been getting rid of them.
> 
> See for example commit e10892189428 ("ext2: use common file type conversion").

Yes, you're right. There is nothing different with DT_XYZ since
I followed what f2fs did when I wrote this place.

Actually, I noticed that patchset once in mailing list months ago
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20181023201952.GA15676@pathfinder/
but I didn't keep eyes on it (whether this patchset is merged or not...)

OK, let me fix that like other fses. Thanks for pointing out.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

> 
>                Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ