lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:10:10 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Anatolij Gustschin <agust@...x.de>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
        openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 06/18] compat_ioctl: move WDIOC handling into wdt
 drivers

On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:49:18PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> All watchdog drivers implement the same set of ioctl commands, and
> fortunately all of them are compatible between 32-bit and 64-bit
> architectures.
> 
> Modern drivers always go through drivers/watchdog/wdt.c as an abstraction
> layer, but older ones implement their own file_operations on a character
> device for this.
> 
> Move the handling from fs/compat_ioctl.c into the individual drivers.
> 
> Note that most of the legacy drivers will never be used on 64-bit
> hardware, because they are for an old 32-bit SoC implementation, but
> doing them all at once is safer than trying to guess which ones do
> or do not need the compat_ioctl handling.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>

This patch doesn't seem to have a useful base (or at least git says so).
It does not apply to mainline nor to my own watchdog-next branch.
I assume you plan to apply the entire series together. Please not
that there will be conflicts against watchdog-next when you do so.

Guenter

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ