lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0835B3720019904CB8F7AA43166CEEB2F18D43A3@RTITMBSVM03.realtek.com.tw>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 02:59:16 +0000
From:   Hayes Wang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        nic_swsd <nic_swsd@...ltek.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next] r8152: divide the tx and rx bottom functions

David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2019 4:59 AM
[...]
> Theoretically, yes.
> 
> But do you have actual performance numbers showing this to be worth
> the change?
> 
> Always provide performance numbers with changes that are supposed to
> improve performance.

On x86, they are almost the same.
Tx/Rx: 943/943 Mbits/sec -> 945/944

For arm platform,
Tx/Rx: 917/917 Mbits/sec -> 933/933
Improve about 1.74%.

Best Regards,
Hayes


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ