[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cda26fbd-c683-d285-dc52-825d5e16a9e1@phytec.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 13:42:38 +0200
From: Stefan Riedmüller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
Andrew Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add PHYTEC i.MX6 UL/ULL
devicetree bindings
Hi Rob,
On 15.08.19 15:43, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 4:55 AM Stefan Riedmüller
> <s.riedmueller@...tec.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Rob,
>>
>> On 13.08.19 18:04, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 09:49:32AM +0200, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
>>>> Add devicetree bindings for i.MX6 UL/ULL based phyCORE-i.MX6 UL/ULL and
>>>> phyBOARD-Segin.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Riedmueller <s.riedmueller@...tec.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> index 7294ac36f4c0..40f007859092 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
>>>> @@ -161,12 +161,20 @@ properties:
>>>> items:
>>>> - enum:
>>>> - fsl,imx6ul-14x14-evk # i.MX6 UltraLite 14x14 EVK Board
>>>> + - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10 # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin with i.MX6 UL
>>>> + - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10-emmc # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin eMMC Kit
>>>> + - phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10-nand # PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin NAND Kit
>>>> + - phytec,imx6ul-pcl063 # PHYTEC phyCORE-i.MX 6UL
>>>
>>> This doesn't match what is in the dts files:
>>>
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-pcl063.dtsi: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063", "fsl,imx6ul";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin-full.dts: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pbacd10", "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063",
>>> "fsl,imx6ul";
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6ul-phytec-phyboard-segin.dtsi: compatible = "phytec,imx6ul-pbacd-10", "phytec,imx6ul-pcl063",
>>> "fsl,imx6ul";
>>
>> Shawn already applied my patches which rename the compatibles, see
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/7/23/42
>
> In any case, it still doesn't match. For example, from those patches:
>
> + model = "PHYTEC phyBOARD-Segin i.MX6 ULL Full Featured with eMMC";
> + compatible = "phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10-emmc", "phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10",
> + "phytec,imx6ull-pcl063","fsl,imx6ull";
>
> The correct schema for this would be:
>
> items:
> - const: phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10-emmc
> - const: phytec,imx6ull-pbacd10
> - const: phytec,imx6ull-pcl063
> - const: fsl,imx6ull
>
> This defines how many entries (4), what they are, and the order of
> them. Maybe the first entry can be an enum with the -nand compatible
> if those are 2 options.
>
> Run 'make dtbs_check' and make sure there aren't warnings for the root node.
Thanks for your input. I will take another closer look at this and send a
new version.
Stefan
>
> Rob
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists