[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <510f6d8a-71a0-fa6e-33ea-c4a4bfa96607@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 16:54:18 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@...il.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] backlight: Expose brightness curve type
through sysfs
On 07/08/2019 21:15, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 12:00:05PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
>> Backlight brightness curves can have different shapes. The two main
>> types are linear and non-linear curves. The human eye doesn't
>> perceive linearly increasing/decreasing brightness as linear (see
>> also 88ba95bedb79 "backlight: pwm_bl: Compute brightness of LED
>> linearly to human eye"), hence many backlights use non-linear (often
>> logarithmic) brightness curves. The type of curve currently is opaque
>> to userspace, so userspace often uses more or less reliable heuristics
>> (like the number of brightness levels) to decide whether to treat a
>> backlight device as linear or non-linear.
>>
>> Export the type of the brightness curve via the new sysfs attribute
>> 'scale'. The value of the attribute can be 'linear', 'non-linear' or
>> 'unknown'. For devices that don't provide information about the scale
>> of their brightness curve the value of the 'scale' attribute is 'unknown'.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
>
> Daniel (et al): do you have any more comments on this patch/series or
> is it ready to land?
I decided to leave it for a long while for others to review since I'm
still a tiny bit uneasy about the linear/non-linear terminology.
However that's my only concern, its fairly minor and I've dragged by
feet for more then long enough, so:
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists