linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen/arm: pass one less argument to dma_cache

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:43:28 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen/arm: pass one less argument to
 dma_cache_maint

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 16/08/2019 14:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Instead of taking apart the dma address in both callers do it inside
>> dma_cache_maint itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm/xen/mm.c | 10 ++++++----
>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> index 90574d89d0d4..d9da24fda2f7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> @@ -43,13 +43,15 @@ static bool hypercall_cflush = false;
>>     /* functions called by SWIOTLB */
>>   -static void dma_cache_maint(dma_addr_t handle, unsigned long offset,
>> -	size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, enum dma_cache_op op)
>> +static void dma_cache_maint(dma_addr_t handle, size_t size,
>> +		enum dma_data_direction dir, enum dma_cache_op op)
>>   {
>>   	struct gnttab_cache_flush cflush;
>>   	unsigned long xen_pfn;
>> +	unsigned long offset = handle & ~PAGE_MASK;
>>   	size_t left = size;
>>   +	offset &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> Ahem... presumably that should be handle, not offset.

Ooops, yes.