[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190816164328.GB3629@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:43:28 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen/arm: pass one less argument to
dma_cache_maint
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 02:37:58PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 16/08/2019 14:00, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> Instead of taking apart the dma address in both callers do it inside
>> dma_cache_maint itself.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/xen/mm.c | 10 ++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> index 90574d89d0d4..d9da24fda2f7 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/xen/mm.c
>> @@ -43,13 +43,15 @@ static bool hypercall_cflush = false;
>> /* functions called by SWIOTLB */
>> -static void dma_cache_maint(dma_addr_t handle, unsigned long offset,
>> - size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, enum dma_cache_op op)
>> +static void dma_cache_maint(dma_addr_t handle, size_t size,
>> + enum dma_data_direction dir, enum dma_cache_op op)
>> {
>> struct gnttab_cache_flush cflush;
>> unsigned long xen_pfn;
>> + unsigned long offset = handle & ~PAGE_MASK;
>> size_t left = size;
>> + offset &= PAGE_MASK;
>
> Ahem... presumably that should be handle, not offset.
Ooops, yes.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists