linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 14:28:46 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To:     Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
        Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling@....com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org" <nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] mm: remove the pgmap field from struct hmm_vma_walk

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:21:41AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:

> > We can do a get_dev_pagemap inside the page_walk and touch the pgmap,
> > or we can do the 'device mutex && retry' pattern and touch the pgmap
> > in the driver, under that lock.
> >
> > However in all cases the current get_dev_pagemap()'s in the page walk
> > are not necessary, and we can delete them.
> 
> Yes, as long as 'struct page' instances resulting from that lookup are
> not passed outside of that lock.

Indeed.

Also, I was reflecting over lunch that the hmm_range_fault should only
return DEVICE_PRIVATE pages for the caller's device (see other thread
with HCH), and in this case, the caller should also be responsible to
ensure that the driver is not calling hmm_range_fault at the same time
it is deleting it's own DEVICE_PRIVATE mapping - ie by fencing its
page fault handler.

This does not apply to PCI_P2PDMA, but, lets see how that looks when
we get there.

So the whole thing seems pretty safe.

Jason