linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: document the choice of page attributes for pgprot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 19:59:42 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Guan Xuetao <gxt@....edu.cn>,
        Shawn Anastasio <shawn@...stas.io>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Paul Burton <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        James Hogan <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] arm64: document the choice of page attributes for
 pgprot_dmacoherent

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 06:31:18PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Mind if I tweak the second sentence to be:
> 
>   This is different from "Device-nGnR[nE]" memory which is intended for MMIO
>   and thus forbids speculation, preserves access size, requires strict
>   alignment and can also force write responses to come from the endpoint.
> 
> ? It's a small change, but it better fits with the arm64 terminology
> ("strongly ordered" is no longer used in the architecture).
> 
> If you're happy with that, I can make the change and queue this patch
> for 5.4.

I'm fine with the change, but you really need this series as base,
as there is no pgprot_dmacoherent before the series.  So I think I'll
have to queue it up if we want it for 5.4, and I'll need a few more
reviews for the other patches in this series first.