linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/19] irqchip/mmp: do not use of_address_to

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e0c0cf62a1f087fd6c1d7307e5e2a65603148341.camel@v3.sk>
Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:41:22 +0200
From:   Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/19] irqchip/mmp: do not use of_address_to_resource()
 to get mux regs

On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 10:31, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
> > are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this
> > point it probably can't be fixed.
> > 
> > On an OLPC XO-1.75 machine, the muxes are children of the intc, not the
> > axi bus, and thus of_address_to_resource() won't work. We should treat
> > the values as mere integers as opposed to bus addresses.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
> > Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> > 
> > ---
> >  drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> > index 14618dc0bd396..af9cba4a51c2e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-mmp.c
> > @@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ IRQCHIP_DECLARE(mmp2_intc, "mrvl,mmp2-intc", mmp2_of_init);
> >  static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  				   struct device_node *parent)
> >  {
> > -	struct resource res;
> >  	int i, ret, irq, j = 0;
> >  	u32 nr_irqs, mfp_irq;
> > +	u32 reg[4];
> >  
> >  	if (!parent)
> >  		return -ENODEV;
> > @@ -438,18 +438,20 @@ static int __init mmp2_mux_of_init(struct device_node *node,
> >  		pr_err("Not found mrvl,intc-nr-irqs property\n");
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > -	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 0, &res);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * For historical reasonsm, the "regs" property of the
> > +	 * mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc is not a regular * "regs" property containing
> > +	 * addresses on the parent bus, but offsets from the intc's base.
> > +	 * That is why we can't use of_address_to_resource() here.
> > +	 */
> > +	ret = of_property_read_u32_array(node, "reg", reg, ARRAY_SIZE(reg));
> 
> This will return 0 even if you've read less than your expected 4 u32s.
> You may want to try of_property_read_variable_u32_array instead.

Will it? Unless I'm reading the of_property_read_u32_array()
documentation wrong, it suggests that would return -EOVERFLOW in that
case.

It ignores the extra values it the property is larger. I guess that is
not a good thing and we still want to use
of_property_read_variable_u32_array() though.

> >  	if (ret < 0) {
> >  		pr_err("Not found reg property\n");
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> >  	}
> > -	icu_data[i].reg_status = mmp_icu_base + res.start;
> > -	ret = of_address_to_resource(node, 1, &res);
> > -	if (ret < 0) {
> > -		pr_err("Not found reg property\n");
> > -		return -EINVAL;
> > -	}
> > -	icu_data[i].reg_mask = mmp_icu_base + res.start;
> > +	icu_data[i].reg_status = mmp_icu_base + reg[0];
> > +	icu_data[i].reg_mask = mmp_icu_base + reg[2];
> >  	icu_data[i].cascade_irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> >  	if (!icu_data[i].cascade_irq)
> >  		return -EINVAL;
> > 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	M.

Thanks
Lubo