lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74b4a00b524cf8dd11631692dee65ccbba34b8cb.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:22:51 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Rishi Gupta <gupt21@...il.com>, sboyd@...nel.org,
        kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     mturquette@...libre.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Remove extraneous 'for' word in comments

On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 12:05 +0530, Rishi Gupta wrote:
> An extra 'for' word is grammatically incorrect in the comment
> 'verifying ops for multi-parent clks'. This commit removes
> this extra for word.

A few other repeated word typos in comments are 
common in the kernel and most could be changed.

$ git grep -P '^\s*/?\*.*\bthe the\b' | wc -l
285
$ git grep -P '^\s*/?\*.*\bto to\b' | wc -l
62
$ git grep -P '^\s*/?\*.*\bfor for\b' | wc -l
31
$ git grep -P
'^\s*/?\*.*\bfrom from\b' | wc -l
22
$ git grep -P '^\s*/?\*.*\bare are\b'
| wc -l
16


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ