linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 16 Aug 2019 21:32:23 -0400
From:   Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
        kernel-team <kernel-team@....com>,
        Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@....com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
        Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@...il.com>,
        Rao Shoaib <rao.shoaib@...cle.com>, rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] rcu/tree: Add basic support for kfree_rcu() batching

Hi Paul,

On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:16 PM Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Hello, Joel,
> > >
> > > I reworked the commit log as follows, but was then unsuccessful in
> > > working out which -rcu commit to apply it to.  Could you please
> > > tell me what commit to apply this to?  (Once applied, git cherry-pick
> > > is usually pretty good about handling minor conflicts.)
> >
> > It was originally based on v5.3-rc2
> >
> > I was able to apply it just now to the rcu -dev branch and I pushed it here:
> > https://github.com/joelagnel/linux-kernel.git (branch paul-dev)
> >
> > Let me know if any other issues, thanks for the change log rework!
>
> Pulled and cherry-picked, thank you!
>
> Just for grins, I also  pushed out a from-joel.2019.08.16a showing the
> results of the pull.  If you pull that branch, then run something like
> "gitk v5.3-rc2..", and then do the same with branch "dev", comparing the
> two might illustrate some of the reasons for the current restrictions
> on pull requests and trees subject to rebase.

Right, I did the compare and see what you mean. I guess sending any
future pull requests against Linux -next would be the best option?

thanks,

 - Joel