[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190817020434.4ef2dc5f@nic.cz>
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 02:04:34 +0200
From: Marek Behun <marek.behun@....cz>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] bus: moxtet: fix unsigned comparison to less than
zero
On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 23:41:06 +0100
Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently the size_t variable res is being checked for
> an error failure however the unsigned variable is never
> less than zero so this test is always false. Fix this by
> making variable res ssize_t
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: 5bc7f990cd98 ("bus: Add support for Moxtet bus")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> ---
> drivers/bus/moxtet.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/moxtet.c b/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
> index 1ee4570e7e17..288a9e4c6c7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/moxtet.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ static ssize_t output_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> struct moxtet *moxtet = file->private_data;
> u8 bin[TURRIS_MOX_MAX_MODULES];
> u8 hex[sizeof(bin) * 2 + 1];
> - size_t res;
> + ssize_t res;
> loff_t dummy = 0;
> int err, i;
>
Hi Colin,
thanks. Should I just Ack this, or do I need to send patch to the
developer who commited my patches?
Thanks.
Marek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists