lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 08:43:01 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Hellström <thomas@...pmail.org>, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>, Steven Price <steven.price@....com>, Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> Subject: Re: cleanup the walk_page_range interface On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 04:41:24PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > I certainly prefer that method of API change :-) > (see the current "keys: Replace uid/gid/perm permissions checking with > an ACL" in linux-next and the (currently) three merge fixup patches I > am carrying. Its not bad when people provide the fixes, but I am no > expert in most areas of the kernel ...) It would mean pretty much duplicating all the code. And then never finish the migration because new users of the old interfaces keep popping up. Compared to that I'd much much prefer either Linus taking it now or a branch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists