[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201908182002.KAH4UW2w%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 20:37:44 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
acme@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com, raph.gault+kdev@...il.com,
Raphael Gault <raphael.gault@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: perf: Enable pmu counter direct access for
perf event on armv8
Hi Raphael,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.3-rc4 next-20190816]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Raphael-Gault/perf-arm64-Add-test-to-check-userspace-access-to-hardware-counters/20190818-182238
config: arm-omap2plus_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 7.4.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.4.0 make.cross ARCH=arm
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function 'refresh_pmuserenr':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:784:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_switch_user_access'; did you mean 'perf_fetch_caller_regs'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
perf_switch_user_access(mm);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
perf_fetch_caller_regs
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function 'armpmu_event_mapped':
>> drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:804:36: error: 'mm_context_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' has no member named 'pmu_direct_access'
if (atomic_inc_return(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access) == 1)
^
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c: In function 'armpmu_event_unmapped':
drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c:813:38: error: 'mm_context_t {aka struct <anonymous>}' has no member named 'pmu_direct_access'
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access))
^
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +784 drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
781
782 static void refresh_pmuserenr(void *mm)
783 {
> 784 perf_switch_user_access(mm);
785 }
786
787 static void armpmu_event_mapped(struct perf_event *event, struct mm_struct *mm)
788 {
789 if (!(event->hw.flags & ARMPMU_EL0_RD_CNTR))
790 return;
791
792 /*
793 * This function relies on not being called concurrently in two
794 * tasks in the same mm. Otherwise one task could observe
795 * pmu_direct_access > 1 and return all the way back to
796 * userspace with user access disabled while another task is still
797 * doing on_each_cpu_mask() to enable user access.
798 *
799 * For now, this can't happen because all callers hold mmap_sem
800 * for write. If this changes, we'll need a different solution.
801 */
802 lockdep_assert_held_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
803
> 804 if (atomic_inc_return(&mm->context.pmu_direct_access) == 1)
805 on_each_cpu(refresh_pmuserenr, mm, 1);
806 }
807
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (36719 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists