lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190818193744.GB29353@zn.tnic>
Date:   Sun, 18 Aug 2019 21:37:45 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Thomas Hellström (VMware) 
        <thomas_os@...pmail.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pv-drivers@...are.com,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add support for updated vmware hypercall instruction

On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 09:02:04PM +0200, Thomas Hellström (VMware) wrote:
> I was trying to be clever and avoid spamming people with stuff they might
> not care about.

Sure but if, for example, you're adding VMWARE_HYPERCALL in patch 2 and
the users are in the following patches, it would be helpful if I could
see them too. That is one good reason to CC everybody with the whole
patchset.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ