[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916710B3613D6C08A68438BF5A90@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2019 06:19:14 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/6] clk: imx8mn: Add necessary frequency support for ARM
PLL table
Hi, Stephen
> Quoting Anson Huang (2019-08-17 15:22:01)
> > Hi, Stephen
> >
> > > Quoting Anson.Huang@....com (2019-08-15 03:59:42)
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > > > b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c index ecd1062..3f1239a 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8mn.c
> > > > @@ -82,6 +84,7 @@ static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mn_dram_pll =
> > > > { static struct imx_pll14xx_clk imx8mn_arm_pll = {
> > > > .type = PLL_1416X,
> > > > .rate_table = imx8mn_pll1416x_tbl,
> > > > + .rate_count = ARRAY_SIZE(imx8mn_pll1416x_tbl),
> > >
> > > Why is rate_count added? That's not described in the commit text.
> >
> > rate_count is necessary for table search during set_rate, it was
> > missed previously, I will add it into commit text in V2.
> >
>
> Right, isn't that a more critical fix to make by itself instead of rolling into this
> change that adds a few more frequencies?
Right, let me split this patch into two patches and resend the V2.
Thanks,
Anson.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists