[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908192229380.4008@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:29:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch 42/44] posix-cpu-timers: Move state tracking to struct
posix_cputimers
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > Put it where it belongs and cleanup the ifdeffery in fork completely.
>
> s/cleanup
> /clean up
>
> > * posix_cputimers - Container for posix CPU timer related data
> > * @expiries: Earliest-expiration cache array based
> > + * @timers_active: Timers are queued.
> > + * @expiry_active: Timer expiry is active. Used for
> > + * process wide timers to avoid multiple
> > + * trying to handle expiry
>
> 'to avoid multiple trying to handle expiry'?
>
> Should this be: 'to avoid multiple tasks trying to handle expiry'?
Yup.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists