[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <252677d2-9e98-d4c8-7fe4-26635c05334d@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:59:16 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
"Bharath Vedartham" <linux.bhar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm/gup: introduce FOLL_PIN flag for
get_user_pages()
On 8/16/19 7:36 PM, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 8/16/19 7:24 PM, jhubbard@...dia.com wrote:
>> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
>> DKIM-Signature: v. a a-sha256; c.laxed/relaxed; d idia.com; s.;
>> t.66008674; bh.Mai0va6k/z2enpQJ4Nfvbj5WByFxGAO1JwdIBbXio h PGP-Universal:From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer:
>> In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:X-NVConfidentiality:
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type;
>> bÖUDSde9XF/IsNteBaYOBWeKiHhWmeU9ekUJNvCviHssBDCtw0T+M/2TlEPEzomIT
>> fGXzIQNlGN6MXFbaBoyBmF/zjCu02TmTNExbVJ3/5N6PTyOuJFCx9ZN1/5gXsB11m1
>> xAHIWE+VOZs4qqDeHDBqKZq+FaxQHNvGz0j6lyVBA70TfseNoZqZZrSil8uvaKJwKd
>> TQ1ht+AGWbw9p610JmaPb4u6o/eV6Ns8Sl3EVnjWWu94T6ISNIaWCiC6wQQF6L1YCH
>> G5Pjn+0rEjhk6XG4TyLudi5lWp3IVBHd8+WlWlnl+bvLCC55RUAjPJLn7LaVyVdh0F
>> nLHwm3bN2Jotg
>
> I cannot readily explain the above email glitch, but I did just now switch
> back to mailgw.nvidia.com for this patchset, in order to get the nice behavior
> of having "From:" really be my native NVIDIA email address. That's very nice,
> but if the glitches happen again, I'll switch back to using gmail for
> git-send-email.
>
> Sorry about the weirdness. It does still let you apply the patch, I
> just now checked on that.
>
Hi Ira, could you please let me know if you'd like me to repost this patch, or
the entire patchset, or if you're able to deal with it as-is? As it stands, the
DKIM-Signature cruft above needs to be manually removed, either from the patch, or
from the commit log after applying the patch.
Also, as noted in the email thread involving Bharath and sgi-gru [1], I'm
currently planning on branching from your tree, and continuing the misc
call site conversions from there. And then just adapting to whatever API
changes are made to vaddr_*() functions. And the biovec call site conversions should
be based on that as well.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/0c2ad29b-934c-ec30-66c3-b153baf1fba5@nvidia.com
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists