linux-kernel - linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the gpio tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190819163008.093911f0@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:30:08 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the gpio-brgl tree with the gpio tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the gpio-brgl tree got a conflict in:

  include/linux/gpio/driver.h

between commit:

  379ce1ff51aa ("gpio: stubs in headers should be inline")

from the gpio tree and commit:

  9091373ab7ea ("gpio: remove less important #ifdef around declarations")

from the gpio-brgl tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc include/linux/gpio/driver.h
index 72d48a2bab65,f28f534f451a..000000000000
--- a/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
+++ b/include/linux/gpio/driver.h
@@@ -20,12 -20,6 +20,8 @@@ struct module
  enum gpiod_flags;
  enum gpio_lookup_flags;
  
- #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB
- 
- #ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
- 
 +struct gpio_chip;
 +
  /**
   * struct gpio_irq_chip - GPIO interrupt controller
   */
@@@ -530,38 -443,6 +523,35 @@@ struct bgpio_pdata 
  	int ngpio;
  };
  
 +#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
 +
 +void gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_twocell(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 +					     struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
 +					     unsigned int parent_hwirq,
 +					     unsigned int parent_type);
 +void gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_fourcell(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 +					      struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
 +					      unsigned int parent_hwirq,
 +					      unsigned int parent_type);
 +
 +#else
 +
 +static inline void gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_twocell(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 +						    struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
 +						    unsigned int parent_hwirq,
 +						    unsigned int parent_type)
 +{
 +}
 +
 +static inline void gpiochip_populate_parent_fwspec_fourcell(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 +						     struct irq_fwspec *fwspec,
 +						     unsigned int parent_hwirq,
 +						     unsigned int parent_type)
 +{
 +}
 +
 +#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY */
 +
- 
- #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_GPIO_GENERIC)
- 
  int bgpio_init(struct gpio_chip *gc, struct device *dev,
  	       unsigned long sz, void __iomem *dat, void __iomem *set,
  	       void __iomem *clr, void __iomem *dirout, void __iomem *dirin,

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped