[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5556778-105a-bdb3-f118-84fe729d042b@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 13:00:07 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
To: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"rkrcmar@...hat.com" <rkrcmar@...hat.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"jschoenh@...zon.de" <jschoenh@...zon.de>,
"karahmed@...zon.de" <karahmed@...zon.de>,
"rimasluk@...zon.com" <rimasluk@...zon.com>,
"Grimm, Jon" <Jon.Grimm@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] kvm: ioapic: Delay update IOAPIC EOI for RTC
On 15.08.19 18:25, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> In-kernel IOAPIC does not update RTC pending EOI info with AMD SVM /w AVIC
> when interrupt is delivered as edge-triggered since AMD processors
> cannot exit on EOI for these interrupts.
>
> Add code to also check LAPIC pending EOI before injecting any new RTC
> interrupts on AMD SVM when AVIC is activated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> index 1add1bc..45e7bb0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/ioapic.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <asm/processor.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> +#include <asm/virtext.h>
> #include <trace/events/kvm.h>
>
> #include "ioapic.h"
> @@ -173,6 +174,7 @@ static bool rtc_irq_check_coalesced(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic)
> return false;
> }
>
> +#define APIC_DEST_NOSHORT 0x0
> static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int irq,
> int irq_level, bool line_status)
> {
> @@ -201,10 +203,36 @@ static int ioapic_set_irq(struct kvm_ioapic *ioapic, unsigned int irq,
> * interrupts lead to time drift in Windows guests. So we track
> * EOI manually for the RTC interrupt.
> */
> - if (irq == RTC_GSI && line_status &&
> - rtc_irq_check_coalesced(ioapic)) {
> - ret = 0;
> - goto out;
> + if (irq == RTC_GSI && line_status) {
> + struct kvm *kvm = ioapic->kvm;
> + union kvm_ioapic_redirect_entry *entry = &ioapic->redirtbl[irq];
> +
> + /*
> + * Since, AMD SVM AVIC accelerates write access to APIC EOI
> + * register for edge-trigger interrupts, IOAPIC will not be
> + * able to receive the EOI. In this case, we do lazy update
> + * of the pending EOI when trying to set IOAPIC irq for RTC.
> + */
> + if (cpu_has_svm(NULL) &&
> + (kvm->arch.apicv_state == APICV_ACTIVATED) &&
> + (entry->fields.trig_mode == IOAPIC_EDGE_TRIG)) {
> + int i;
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> + if (kvm_apic_match_dest(vcpu, NULL,
> + KVM_APIC_DEST_NOSHORT,
> + entry->fields.dest_id,
> + entry->fields.dest_mode)) {
> + __rtc_irq_eoi_tracking_restore_one(vcpu);
I don't understand why this works. This code just means we're injecting
an EOI on the first CPU that has the vector mapped, right when we're
setting it to trigger, no?
Alex
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (rtc_irq_check_coalesced(ioapic)) {
> + ret = 0;
> + goto out;
> + }
> }
>
> old_irr = ioapic->irr;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists