linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Skip deferred request irqs for devices known to fail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFXWsS83PqmqNOO22bktuAw+H7-X8RvNOgUnV--bWpTMkD7OPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:35:19 +1000
From:   Ian W MORRISON <ianwmorrison@...il.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        bgolaszewski@...libre.com, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Skip deferred request irqs for devices known to fail

Hi Hans and everyone,

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 04:59, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Ian, et. al.,
>
> As such I guess we may need to go with the blacklist patch you suggested
> which sucks, but having these devices not boot sucks even harder.
>
> I guess this problem did not magically fix it self in the mean time
> (with newer kernels) ?
>

Unfortunately it didn't 'self-fix' with later kernels.

> Can you resubmit your patch with Andy's review remarks addressed?
>
> In case you've lost Andy's reply I will reproduce the review remarks
> below.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>

Resubmitted as requested.

Many thanks and best regards,
Ian