linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to be reserved

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908191504570.2147@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:08:53 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk>
cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, bhe@...hat.com,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, lijiang@...hat.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/mm: Identify the end of the kernel area to
 be reserved

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Mike Lothian wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 at 12:09, Mike Lothian <mike@...eburn.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > As it's related. I've raised
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204495 about the
> > relocatition I'm seeing since switching back to ld.bfd - is this safe
> > to ignore? I'm guessing this is why gold isn't working as it can't do
> > them
> 
> Sorry am I asking in the wrong place about this?

No, but I haven't come around to look at it. As your mail above is not
giving any useful information and requires to fire up a browser it got on
the back burner.

That bugzilla entry does not tell anything about the compiler involved, the
binutils version and the .config file. I'm really bad at guesswork and my
crystal ball got lost years ago :)

Care to give that information here by mail?

Thanks,

	tglx