[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20190819221027.80cb13a596c5c21fdbee79ff@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 22:10:27 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Anil S Keshavamurthy <anil.s.keshavamurthy@...el.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
Hi Jisheng,
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 11:35:27 +0000
Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@...aptics.com> wrote:
> Implement KPROBES_ON_FTRACE for arm64.
>
> Applied after FTRACE_WITH_REGS:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2019-August/674404.html
Looks interesting! thanks for working on it.
I'll check it.
Thanks,
>
> Jisheng Zhang (4):
> kprobes: adjust kprobe addr for KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
> kprobes/x86: use instruction_pointer and instruction_pointer_set
> kprobes: move kprobe_ftrace_handler() from x86 and make it weak
> arm64: implement KPROBES_ON_FTRACE
>
> arch/arm64/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/probes/ftrace.c | 16 +++++++++++
> arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/ftrace.c | 43 ----------------------------
> kernel/kprobes.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kernel/probes/ftrace.c
>
> --
> 2.23.0.rc1
>
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists