[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190819133441.ejomv6cprdcz7hh6@willie-the-truck>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 14:34:42 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Walter Wu <walter-zh.wu@...iatek.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
wsd_upstream@...iatek.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kasan: fix phys_to_virt() false positive on
tag-based kasan
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:23:48PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 01:56:26PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 07:44:20PM +0800, Walter Wu wrote:
> > > __arm_v7s_unmap() call iopte_deref() to translate pyh_to_virt address,
> > > but it will modify pointer tag into 0xff, so there is a false positive.
> > >
> > > When enable tag-based kasan, phys_to_virt() function need to rewrite
> > > its original pointer tag in order to avoid kasan report an incorrect
> > > memory corruption.
> >
> > Hmm. Which tree did you see this on? We've recently queued a load of fixes
> > in this area, but I /thought/ they were only needed after the support for
> > 52-bit virtual addressing in the kernel.
>
> I'm seeing similar issues in the virtio blk code (splat below), atop of
> the arm64 for-next/core branch. I think this is a latent issue, and
> people are only just starting to test with KASAN_SW_TAGS.
>
> It looks like the virtio blk code will round-trip a SLUB-allocated pointer from
> virt->page->virt, losing the per-object tag in the process.
>
> Our page_to_virt() seems to get a per-page tag, but this only makes
> sense if you're dealing with the page allocator, rather than something
> like SLUB which carves a page into smaller objects giving each object a
> distinct tag.
>
> Any round-trip of a pointer from SLUB is going to lose the per-object
> tag.
Urgh, I wonder how this is supposed to work?
If we end up having to check the KASAN shadow for *_to_virt(), then why
do we need to store anything in the page flags at all? Andrey?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists