[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1908191541340.2147@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 15:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>,
GNU C Library <libc-alpha@...rceware.org>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
Subject: Re: New kernel interface for sys_tz and timewarp?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > On 14/08/2019 11:09:36+0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > On Mi, 14.08.19 10:31, Arnd Bergmann (arnd@...db.de) wrote:
> > >
> > > > - glibc stops passing the caller timezone argument to the kernel
> > > > - the distro kernel disables CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS,
> > > > CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC and CONFIG_GENERIC_CMOS_UPDATE
> > >
> > > What's the benefit of letting userspace do this? It sounds a lot more
> > > fragile to leave this syncing to userspace if the kernel can do this
> > > trivially on its own.
>
> Good point, why CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC has been added to the kernel?
023f333a99ce ("NTP: Add a CONFIG_RTC_SYSTOHC configuration")
Powered by blists - more mailing lists