linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according to nr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 21:52:18 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] genirq/affinity: Spread vectors on node according
 to nr_cpu ratio

On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 03:13:58PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2019, Ming Lei wrote:
> 
> > Cc: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
> > Reported-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>
> 
> This version is sufficiently different from the previous one, so I do not
> consider the reviewed-by tags still being valid and meaningful. Don't
> include them unless you just do cosmetic changes.

Fine.

However, the V6 only change isn't big, just for addressing the un-initialized
warning, and the change is only done on function of irq_build_affinity_masks().

Thanks,
Ming