[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190819144632.GW28441@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 07:46:32 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu dev 1/3] rcu/tree: tick_dep_set/clear_cpu should
accept bits instead of masks
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 02:38:38PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 10:53:09PM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > This commit fixes the issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@...lfernandes.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
> > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 0512de9ead20..322b1b57967c 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -829,7 +829,7 @@ static __always_inline void rcu_nmi_enter_common(bool irq)
> > !rdp->dynticks_nmi_nesting &&
> > rdp->rcu_urgent_qs && !rdp->rcu_forced_tick) {
> > rdp->rcu_forced_tick = true;
> > - tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU);
> > + tick_dep_set_cpu(rdp->cpu, TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU);
>
> Did I suggest you to use the _MASK_ value? That was a bit mean.
> Sorry for all that lost debugging time :-(
At some point, I should have looked at the other calls to these
functions. :-/
But would the following patch make sense? This would not help for (say)
use of TICK_MASK_BIT_POSIX_TIMER instead of TICK_DEP_BIT_POSIX_TIMER, but
would help for any new values that might be added later on. And currently
for TICK_DEP_MASK_CLOCK_UNSTABLE and TICK_DEP_MASK_RCU.
Thanx, Paul
------------------------------------------------------------------------
diff --git a/include/linux/tick.h b/include/linux/tick.h
index 39eb44564058..4ed788ce5762 100644
--- a/include/linux/tick.h
+++ b/include/linux/tick.h
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ enum tick_dep_bits {
TICK_DEP_BIT_CLOCK_UNSTABLE = 3,
TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU = 4
};
+#define TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX TICK_DEP_BIT_RCU
#define TICK_DEP_MASK_NONE 0
#define TICK_DEP_MASK_POSIX_TIMER (1 << TICK_DEP_BIT_POSIX_TIMER)
@@ -215,24 +216,28 @@ extern void tick_nohz_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
*/
static inline void tick_dep_set(enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_set(bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_clear(enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_clear(bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_set_cpu(int cpu, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
tick_nohz_dep_set_cpu(cpu, bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_clear_cpu(int cpu, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(cpu))
tick_nohz_dep_clear_cpu(cpu, bit);
}
@@ -240,24 +245,28 @@ static inline void tick_dep_clear_cpu(int cpu, enum tick_dep_bits bit)
static inline void tick_dep_set_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_set_task(tsk, bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_clear_task(struct task_struct *tsk,
enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_clear_task(tsk, bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_set_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_set_signal(signal, bit);
}
static inline void tick_dep_clear_signal(struct signal_struct *signal,
enum tick_dep_bits bit)
{
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(bit > TICK_DEP_BIT_MAX);
if (tick_nohz_full_enabled())
tick_nohz_dep_clear_signal(signal, bit);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists