[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190819155014.GD9927@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 16:50:14 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: jmorris@...ei.org, sashal@...nel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
corbet@....net, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
james.morse@....com, vladimir.murzin@....com,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, bhsharma@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/14] arm64, hibernate: create_safe_exec_page cleanup
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:46:17PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> create_safe_exec_page() is going to be split into two parts in preparation
> of moving page table handling code out of hibernate.c
>
> Remove allocator parameter, and rename dst to page. Also, remove the
> goto's, as we can return directly without cleanups.
It would be nice if you could do the goto/allocator/rename changes as
separate patches, since it's vastly easier to verify each change in
isolation that way.
What's the point of the rename? It's inconsistent with the phys_dst_addr
that you leave as-is, so I'm not sure that's worthwhile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c | 60 +++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> index 9341fcc6e809..96b6f8da7e49 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hibernate.c
> @@ -196,57 +196,51 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(arch_hibernation_header_restore);
> */
> static int create_safe_exec_page(void *src_start, size_t length,
> unsigned long dst_addr,
> - phys_addr_t *phys_dst_addr,
> - void *(*allocator)(gfp_t mask),
> - gfp_t mask)
> + phys_addr_t *phys_dst_addr)
> {
> - int rc = 0;
> + void *page = (void *)get_safe_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
> + pgd_t *trans_table;
The addition of this trans_table variable wasn't mentioned in the commit
message...
> + trans_table = (void *)get_safe_page(GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!trans_table)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> - pgdp = pgd_offset_raw(allocator(mask), dst_addr);
> + pgdp = pgd_offset_raw(trans_table, dst_addr);
> - write_sysreg(phys_to_ttbr(virt_to_phys(pgdp)), ttbr0_el1);
> + write_sysreg(phys_to_ttbr(virt_to_phys(trans_table)), ttbr0_el1);
... and I guess you're trying to ensure that we program the TTBR with
the correct base address, without the offset of whatever pgd entry we
happen to have plumbed in?
I think that's a fix, and should come before any other cleanup or
rework.
If you can respin that specific change with s/trans_table/pgdir/, that
would make sense to me.
Thanks,
Mark.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists