[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0f1487356ae2e9ff185ede2359381630007538c7.camel@perches.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2019 08:58:22 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
Christopher S Hall <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PTP: introduce new versions of IOCTLs
On Mon, 2019-08-19 at 08:43 -0700, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 03:07:18PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Also the original patch deletes 2 case entries for
> > PTP_PIN_GETFUNC and PTP_PIN_SETFUNC and converts them to
> > PTP_PIN_GETFUNC2 and PTP_PIN_SETFUNC2 but still uses tests
> > for the deleted case label entries making part of the case
> > code block unreachable.
> >
> > That's at least a defect:
> >
> > - case PTP_PIN_GETFUNC:
> > + case PTP_PIN_GETFUNC2:
> >
> > and
> >
> > - case PTP_PIN_SETFUNC:
> > + case PTP_PIN_SETFUNC2:
>
> Good catch. Felipe, please fix that!
>
> (Regarding Joe's memset suggestion, I'll leave that to your discretion.)
Not just how declarations are done or memset.
Minimizing unnecessary stack consumption is generally good.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists