lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323459733.69859.1566234633793.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date:   Mon, 19 Aug 2019 19:10:33 +0200 (CEST)
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To:     linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc:     gaoxiang25@...wei.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        yuchao0@...wei.com, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: erofs: Question on unused fields in on-disk structs

Hi!

struct erofs_super_block has "checksum" and "features" fields,
but they are not used in the source.
What is the plan for these?

Same for i_checksum in erofs_inode_v1 and erofs_inode_v2.

At least the "features" field in the super block is something I'd
expect to be used.
...such that you can have new filesystem features in future.

Thanks,
//richard

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ